Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparing electronic examination methods for assessing engineering students|
|Alternative title / Subtitle:||the case of multiple-choice questions and constructed response questions|
|Authors:||Τριάντης, Δήμος Α.|
Βεντούρας, Ερρίκος Μ.
Στεργιόπουλος, Χαράλαμπος Χ.
|Contributors:||Χλούπης, Γεώργιος Π.|
|Item type:||Conference publication|
|Conference Item Type:||Poster|
|Keywords:||Assessment methodologies;Computer-aided examination methods;Constructed response questions;Evaluation algorithms;Multiple choice questions;Scoring rules;Undergraduate engineering modules;Μεθοδολογίες αξιολόγησης;Κατασκευασμένες απαντήσεις ερωτήσεις;Αλγόριθμοι αξιολόγησης;Ερωτήσεις πολλαπλής επιλογής;Κανόνες βαθμολόγησης;Προπτυχιακές μονάδες μηχανικής|
|Publisher:||SCITEPRESS Digital Library|
|Abstract:||The aim of this work is the comparison of two well-known examination methods, the first consisted of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and the second based on constructed-response questions (CRQs). During this research MCQ and CRQ tests were created for examining the undergraduate engineering module of "project management" and were given to a group of students. Computers and a special software package were used to support the process. During the first part the examinees had to answer a set of CRQs. Afterwards, they had to answer a set of MCQs. Both sets covered the same topics and had the same level of difficulty. The second method (MCQs) is more objective in terms of grading, though it may conceal an error in the final formulation of the score when a student gives an answer based on an instinctive feeling. To eliminate this problem a set of MCQs pairs was composed taking care that each question of the pair addressed the same topic in a way that the similarity would not be evident to a student who did not possess adequate knowledge. By applying a suitable scoring rule to the MCQs, very similar results are obtained when comparing these two examination methods.|
|Citation:||Triantis, D.A., Ventouras, E.M., Leraki, I., Stergiopoulos, C.C., Stavrakas, I., et al. (2014) Comparing electronic examination methods for assessing engineering students: the case of multiple-choice questions and constructed response questions, In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, CSEDU 2014. Barcelona, Spain. 1-3 April, 2014. [online] 1. p.126-132. Available from: http://www.scitepress.org/|
|Conference:||6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, CSEDU 2014|
|License:||Αναφορά Δημιουργού-Μη Εμπορική Χρήση-Όχι Παράγωγα Έργα 3.0 Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες|
|Appears in Collections:||Δημοσιεύσεις|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License